-
Sign Up! To view all forums and unlock additional cool features
Welcome to the #1 Explorer ST Forum and Explorer ST community dedicated to Explorer ST owners and enthusiasts. Register for an account, it's free and it's easy, so don't hesitate to join the Explorer ST Forum today!
So what's the consensus on floor lines..
- Thread starter ThwopKing
- Start date
Interestingly enough I’m dealing with this right now. My year old Weathertechs look like hell…the driver side is warped all to hell and nowhere near the quality of their other liners I have in other vehicles.
I asked around and everyone said either OEM or SmartLiner. I ordered the SmartLiners this morning since they were a little cheaper.
I asked around and everyone said either OEM or SmartLiner. I ordered the SmartLiners this morning since they were a little cheaper.
-
1
- Show All
I had the WT’s and they warped quite fast - surprisingly. So I went with OEM on all 3 rows. Good quality but still some slight warping (that’s to be expected). I will say that the coverage on the OEM is slightly better.
On the 3rd row mat, the WeatherTech mat is excellent - the OEM mat seems puny and has less coverage.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
On the 3rd row mat, the WeatherTech mat is excellent - the OEM mat seems puny and has less coverage.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- Messages
- 391
- Reactions
- 360
- Points
- 67
- Location
- Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA
- Vehicle
- 2020 Explorer ST
Ive got the Husky Weatherbeaters, which are the cheaper of their two lines... and after I got them realized I meant to order the X-Act Contour ones.
The Weatherbeaters are like a molded plastic where as the X-Act Contour are a molded rubber... Much nicer mat that I have had in several other trucks.
Im not "unhappy" with the weatherbeaters, the fit and finish, protection, etc... is great, but I wish I had bought the rubber ones instead of the plastic ones...
The Weatherbeaters are like a molded plastic where as the X-Act Contour are a molded rubber... Much nicer mat that I have had in several other trucks.
Im not "unhappy" with the weatherbeaters, the fit and finish, protection, etc... is great, but I wish I had bought the rubber ones instead of the plastic ones...
-
1
- Show All
Shocked to hear weather tech issues, I have them in my Jeep and when I clean them they look like after years.
I have the OEM ones, only because the car "came" with them, but I have to say they have held up well and I'm pleased with them.
I had the opportunity to tour the Husky factory once, in a great small town and as American as it gets. Haven't tried their mats but I probably will in the future.
I have the OEM ones, only because the car "came" with them, but I have to say they have held up well and I'm pleased with them.
I had the opportunity to tour the Husky factory once, in a great small town and as American as it gets. Haven't tried their mats but I probably will in the future.
I am a big fan of huskyliners. Used their warranty several times and it was free shipping both ways. That being said, i do have OEM in my ST and think they are pretty good. Decent enough not to replace with huskyliners. I had weathertech in the past and slipped on then when getting in a few times if they were really wet or had some ice/snow on them. That was like 10 years ago though.
I had TuxMats in my previous vehicle. Looked great, functioned great, and still look like new after 2.5 years. Liked them much better than the WeatherTechs I had experienced in the past. New ST came with the floor liners, so I'll just stick with these for now, but did verify the TuxMats are available, if I decide to upgrade.
-
1
- Show All
