• Sign Up! To view all forums and unlock additional cool features

    Welcome to the #1 Explorer ST Forum and Explorer ST community dedicated to Explorer ST owners and enthusiasts. Register for an account, it's free and it's easy, so don't hesitate to join the Explorer ST Forum today!


Ford Performance Tune

I Bleed Ford Blue

I Bleed Ford Blue

Active Member
U.S. Navy Veteran
#142
Messages
771
Reactions
532
Points
232
Location
Ohio
Vehicle
23 Rapid Red Explorer ST
#142
It's been talked about, for 8 pages. What else is left to say.
 

I Bleed Ford Blue

I Bleed Ford Blue

Active Member
U.S. Navy Veteran
#143
Messages
771
Reactions
532
Points
232
Location
Ohio
Vehicle
23 Rapid Red Explorer ST
#143
Blaster7Romeo said:
Not necessarily...they probably just did some of the same stuff ZFG dose in there tuning.
Click to expand...
Actually it would. The 20 and 21 platinum and king ranch owners got the same engine as our ST's but detuned down to 365 hp from the factory. So an aftermarket tune would get you back the 35 hp plus what ever their tune gets you.
 

CareerFiremanGuy

CareerFiremanGuy

1000 Post Club
Firefighter/EMT
#144
Messages
1,083
Reactions
813
Points
262
Location
USA
Vehicle
2022 Ford Explorer ST
#144
KegsBdry said:
https://performanceparts.ford.com/part/M-9603-EX30

Ford Performance finally released a tune after years of requests to stay under warranty. And it's 30 HP for $850?! Why are we not talking about this more? What a let down. (n)
Click to expand...
That's because:

#1 FORD is late to the game with their tune
#2 Their tune produces significantly less hp than what 3rd party tuners make
#3 Many people are wondering how FORD can offer a tune with unaddressed rear bolt shears

I Bleed Ford Blue said:
It's been talked about, for 8 pages. What else is left to say.
Click to expand...
It's an internet forum. Where people are happy to ramble on for days over literally nothing.:D
 

UNBROKEN

UNBROKEN

4000 Post Club
#145
Messages
4,640
Reactions
5,544
Points
352
Location
Houston, TX, USA
#145
twin001

twin001

Member
#146
Messages
354
Reactions
249
Points
37
Location
Cincinnati, OH, USA
#146
schaggatron said:
This aged well. ;)
Click to expand...
It actually did age well. Based on the information Ford provided on THEIR tune it does nothing. The graph shows a "Baseline 87 Octane" vs "FPP Tune 93 Octane"......terrible comparison for a test. Of course it will make more power on 93, it is inherent to the fuel used. Now, the 2nd grade level Excel plot leads to many additional questions regarding the validity of any actual tests. Bottom line is this tune is a joke and there is zero credibility behind the “results” shown.

E281CEC5-9200-4896-A98B-C52A6F75D21D.jpeg
 

Last edited:
CareerFiremanGuy

CareerFiremanGuy

1000 Post Club
Firefighter/EMT
#147
Messages
1,083
Reactions
813
Points
262
Location
USA
Vehicle
2022 Ford Explorer ST
#147
twin001 said:
It actually did age well. Based on the information Ford provided on THEIR tune it does nothing. The graph shows a "Baseline 87 Octane" vs "FPP Tune 93 Octane"......terrible comparison for a test. Of course it will make more power on 93, it is inherent to the fuel used. Now, the 2nd grade level Excel plot leads to many additional questions regarding the validity of any actual tests. Bottom line is this tune is a joke.
Click to expand...
I share your concerns.

How can they make a "Stock vs Tuned" comparison when the stock number used 87 octane and their tuned result used Premium?
How did they get 400 hp stock on 87 octane when their own advertising stated they made that number using Premium fuel?

Either someone made a mistake on the chart (it should've read "400 hp stock on Premium"), or we're not being told the whole story.

I would've really been interested in their tune were it not for that anomaly. Guess now I'll have to wait for someone to buy it and do back to back dyno testing.
 

B

Big Turk

Member
#148
Messages
406
Reactions
235
Points
37
Location
Ontario, Canada
#148
CareerFiremanGuy said:
I share your concerns.

How can they make a "Stock vs Tuned" comparison when the stock number used 87 octane and their tuned result used Premium?
How did they get 400 hp stock on 87 octane when their own advertising stated they made that number using Premium fuel?

Either someone made a mistake on the chart (it should've read "400 hp stock on Premium"), or we're not being told the whole story.

I would've really been interested in their tune were it not for that anomaly. Guess now I'll have to wait for someone to buy it and do back to back dyno testing.
Click to expand...
I think someone made a boo boo on the graph. The Bronco tune compares base on 93 to tuned on 93.
 

B

Blown F-150

Member
#149
Messages
388
Reactions
338
Points
67
Location
Calgary, AB, Canada
#149
twin001 said:
It actually did age well. Based on the information Ford provided on THEIR tune it does nothing. The graph shows a "Baseline 87 Octane" vs "FPP Tune 93 Octane"......terrible comparison for a test. Of course it will make more power on 93, it is inherent to the fuel used. Now, the 2nd grade level Excel plot leads to many additional questions regarding the validity of any actual tests. Bottom line is this tune is a joke and there is zero credibility behind the “results” shown. View attachment 14557
Click to expand...
We know it doesn’t make the 400hp on 87. It’s a typo. The graph is a joke, however they aren’t going to show whp results, nothing Ford or Ford Performance had shown for any vehicle I’ve looked at shows whp results, so the graph is a stop gap.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

S

st8

1000 Post Club
#151
Messages
1,083
Reactions
481
Points
212
Location
Bel Air, MD, USA
#151
st8 said:
I could see it bringing it up to the bronco raptor. Same engine, putting out more power than the ST.
Click to expand...
And they did just that, in fact even a little better. I honestly don’t know why people are surprised at what ford did with this. Aftermarket will nearly always outpace what oem can do.
 

northof60expST

northof60expST

Member
#152
Messages
71
Reactions
48
Points
17
Location
Yellowknife, NT, Canada
Vehicle
2022 Ford Explorer ST
#152
Ford put out a tune as they said they would. True to their word. Ford never once said how much HP the tune would have. If you want to keep the warranty no questions asked, then this is the one to go with.
 

CareerFiremanGuy

CareerFiremanGuy

1000 Post Club
Firefighter/EMT
#153
Messages
1,083
Reactions
813
Points
262
Location
USA
Vehicle
2022 Ford Explorer ST
#153
st8 said:
you mean like yourself and the constant bolt discussions? Haha
Click to expand...
You mean like yourself and the never ending tunes threads? Lolol

st8 said:
And they did just that, in fact even a little better. I honestly don’t know why people are surprised at what ford did with this. Aftermarket will nearly always outpace what oem can do.
Click to expand...
^See what I mean? Take a breather and give it a rest already. Rofl
 

CareerFiremanGuy

CareerFiremanGuy

1000 Post Club
Firefighter/EMT
#154
Messages
1,083
Reactions
813
Points
262
Location
USA
Vehicle
2022 Ford Explorer ST
#154
Big Turk said:
I think someone made a boo boo on the graph. The Bronco tune compares base on 93 to tuned on 93.
Click to expand...
Finally, someone with a post that makes sense.(y)
 

B

bluesnake01

Member
#155
Messages
384
Reactions
183
Points
37
Location
Socal
#155
How long till we see another bolt thread regarding Ford's tune made by our favorite guy LOL!
 

G

gjhughes85

New Member
#156
Messages
1
Reactions
6
Points
2
Location
Florida
Vehicle
Explorer
#156
Honestly, this fits my needs. Fixing the gearbox (that should have been a general update from Ford anyway) and giving a boost in power without voiding the warranty. I don't see any downside, apart from having to use 93 to unlock the benefits.

Has anyone else tried this? Would love to have some feedback from others on their experience of this exact product.
 

KegsBdry

KegsBdry

Active Member
#157
Messages
931
Reactions
415
Points
182
Location
WashDC
#157
gjhughes85 said:
Honestly, this fits my needs. Fixing the gearbox (that should have been a general update from Ford anyway) and giving a boost in power without voiding the warranty. I don't see any downside, apart from having to use 93 to unlock the benefits.

Has anyone else tried this? Would love to have some feedback from others on their experience of this exact product.
Click to expand...
I've asked about it to my dealership, but they haven't done one yet. I don't want to be their first customer on this tune.
 

D

dolsen

Member
U.S. Marine Veteran
#158
Messages
285
Reactions
170
Points
37
Location
Louisville, KY, USA
#158
twin001 said:
READ MY LIPS......NO NEW..errrr, there will never be a Ford Performance tune. Keep bugging Ford Performance all you want, it just won't happen. You will ask them in May and they'll say "end of Q3". Q3 = Q4 and so on.
Click to expand...
This didn't age well
 

Stone17

Stone17

Member
#159
Messages
376
Reactions
235
Points
37
Location
Houston, TX, USA
Vehicle
2022 Ford Explorer ST
#159
KegsBdry said:
I've asked about it to my dealership, but they haven't done one yet. I don't want to be their first customer on this tune.
Click to expand...
The Ford Performance Tune start to ship 10/12/2022 .My Local Dealership said $180 (1.5 HR) to install the tune.
 

D

dolsen

Member
U.S. Marine Veteran
#160
Messages
285
Reactions
170
Points
37
Location
Louisville, KY, USA
#160
twin001 said:
It actually did age well. Based on the information Ford provided on THEIR tune it does nothing. The graph shows a "Baseline 87 Octane" vs "FPP Tune 93 Octane"......terrible comparison for a test. Of course it will make more power on 93, it is inherent to the fuel used. Now, the 2nd grade level Excel plot leads to many additional questions regarding the validity of any actual tests. Bottom line is this tune is a joke and there is zero credibility behind the “results” shown.

View attachment 14557
Click to expand...
You folks are putting too much stock in the technical details created by the marketing department. It's likely inaccurate
 

You must log in or register to reply here.

Explorer ST Posts



Top