Search results

(y)Thank you for your service.(y)

Umm, err ... okay! :eek: (y)Thank you for your service.(y)

God Bless Poland! You guys are holding down the fort for democracy and sanity in that part of the world.(y)

If you're bouncing off the rev limiter, you're probably spinning the tires and you're not actually going 30-40 mph.

Man, people today be crazy! (or just really, really bored)

To go "total" stealth mode, you'd have to get some assistance from the US Air Force. :cool:

I'm sure everyone's up to speed on the best YT car review channels, but in case you missed this one: (drag test starts @ 8:25)

I know we've come a long way since 1992, but I thought some of you would find it interesting ... 1992 GMC Typhoon Base price: $29,530 ($63,352 adj for inflation) 262 cu in / 4.3L 280 hp / 350 lb-ft Passenger volume: 91 cu ft Cargo volume: 28 cu ft Curb weight: 3,822 lb 0-60 mph: 5.3 sec 5–60...

TO FORUM MOD: As I take an overview of this topic, it's apparent that it has nowhere to go. We're not seeing anything close to what some people would have us believe regarding breaks. Feel free to close this thread as you wish, it's played its course. CareerFiremanGuy

Okay, if nobody responds I get it. Because the gargantuan elephant in the room is that even if a paltry 10% of vehicles in the recall broke their bolt, that would literally mean 25,000 thousand people swarming the internet with their stories. But the fact remains we're just not seeing it. And...

Anybody? Would like to see people's guesses as to what those two "corrective actions" were. And if those two actions are the reason we're not seeing anywhere near the number of reported breaks as some people would have us believe.

I revisited one of the first articles that reported the bolt shear and found two interesting items (highlighted in yellow). First, that FORD Engineering was aware of the problem on 8/10/21. Second, that Dakotta (the assembler of the rear module) applied 2 "corrective actions" (in 02/20 and...

Hope you get it figured out. Window Sticker says 20 mpg Combined (18 mpg City and 24 mpg Highway). That's exactly what I'm getting, and it's exactly what you should be getting.

Well, I was going to do it. But $191 for something I don't usually see that I step over with my foot ... nah.

Heh Autoworker, hope you don't mind I slightly altered your pic for ST forum members ...

Maybe you got the Mach-E's programming and it's trying to read MPGe.;) The lowest I got was when it was brand new and it showed some crazy low numbers. After that, the lowest I've seen is 19.9 mpg and the highest 20.9 mpg.

That's 'cause I'm a funny guy, writing such humourous material like ... "I tried to get my ST in for an oil change, but was told by the Service Dept that they're backlogged with all the one bolt repairs." NOT!

Okay, I've updated pricing on the vehicles in the comparison. They are to the right of the original price quote in RED with (brackets). Some changed very little. Some changed a lot. SPOILER: ST remains the performance value leader.(y)

Let us know how you do. I've been into keeping my vehicles stock for at least the last decade (Mustangs, Taurus SHO, Stinger GT, etc.). A big change from when I used to bring them home from the dealer and started stripping parts off of them. Lol

And it's been proven to you that people have lied about all the supposed rear bolt breaks they've "seen"... so the .09% figure remains legit, using the only concrete information that we have, misinformation coming from deceitful owners hell bent on spreading PANIC on both the 1/3 and 2/4...