Sign Up! To view all forums and unlock additional cool features
Welcome to the #1 Explorer ST Forum and Explorer ST community dedicated to Explorer ST owners and enthusiasts. Register for an account, it's free and it's easy, so don't hesitate to join the Explorer ST Forum today!
I did, but was kind of surprised that it wasn't 3.5" in the middle to account for the reduction in volume that a single 3" pipe would give you vs 2x2.25" or 2x2.5" . Single 3" should be plenty though, and you do save on materials. The fabrication work looks amazing!
I did, but was kind of surprised that it wasn't 3.5" in the middle to account for the reduction in volume that a single 3" pipe would give you vs 2x2.25" or 2x2.5" . Single 3" should be plenty though, and you do save on materials. The fabrication work looks amazing!
You're right, a 3" pipe is plenty. The name of the game in exhaust design (for performance, not acoustics) is to keep the velocity high so as to retain as much inertial energy as possible with as little surface area as possible. A smaller surface area equates to more heat retention which contributes to the inertial energy. I put out an entire thread on this subject here:
Honestly no need for downpipes for me right now, and i also heard that a few companies were coming out with their own so i wanted to wait...
Also, finances do play a roll in this. If i do Downpipes i'll have to do a ZFG tune, but when i do the tune i want my charge pipes and a intake done (make TI ones). So it's really time/funding is holding me back.
Nice work! Sounds fantastic and I’m super jealous, been thinking about valvetronic as well. Think I’ll save up some allowance and try to do something similar. Thanks for the fine example!
Does it hurt to have the valvetronic mufflers mounted in reverse? In all the installs I've seen except this one, the "elbow" end is to the rear of the vehicle. Does it make any difference?