• Sign Up! To view all forums and unlock additional cool features

    Welcome to the #1 Explorer ST Forum and Explorer ST community dedicated to Explorer ST owners and enthusiasts. Register for an account, it's free and it's easy, so don't hesitate to join the Explorer ST Forum today!


Torque Converter Stall Speed

DaveFikel

New Member
U.S. Navy Veteran
Firefighter
Messages
7
Reactions
0
Points
1
Location
Chesterfield, VA
Vehicle
2023 Explorer ST
#1
Hi guys-

I'm going to rebuild my 10R60 with a SunCoast Category 3 kit. I figure I might as well replace the torque converter since the trans will be removed and it makes sense to replace it then. I have no clue about choosing the torque converter stall speed & am hopeful to get a bit of advice.

My goal is the quickest quarter mile as I will never, ever get near the top end speed of my ST. Going that fast will probably just scare the crap put of me. I plan on replacing the spark plugs and beefing up the turbos, fuel pump, & injectors this summer. I'm also running on E-50 on a ZFG tune.

So, what stall speed would you choose for a category 3 rebuild kit? Keeping in mind I'm interested in being quick off the line and don't care much about top end speed.

Thanks in advance!
 

Messages
1,863
Reactions
879
Points
162
Location
Nevada
Vehicle
'20 Raptor, '22 Explorer ST, '14 GT500, '03 F150
#2
Curious also to see what the optimal stall speed is. @ZFGracing would know, and RSA would be able to tell you also.
 

Messages
1,777
Reactions
1,293
Points
262
Location
Chicago, IL, USA
#3
Good advice!

Depends totally on the hp/torque curve. You want the stall speed to be close to where the engine starts making good power after the turbo lag. Having said that, if you’ve never driven a vehicle with a high stall converter there are disadvantages. Higher stall means more heat and daily driving is not a lot of fun.

Don’t know what the spec for the ST converter is but my guess is it’s higher than a NA engine. I can hit almost 3k standing still.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 

Messages
1,863
Reactions
879
Points
162
Location
Nevada
Vehicle
'20 Raptor, '22 Explorer ST, '14 GT500, '03 F150
#4
Good advice!

Depends totally on the hp/torque curve. You want the stall speed to be close to where the engine starts making good power after the turbo lag. Having said that, if you’ve never driven a vehicle with a high stall converter there are disadvantages. Higher stall means more heat and daily driving is not a lot of fun.

Don’t know what the spec for the ST converter is but my guess is it’s higher than a NA engine. I can hit almost 3k standing still.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
See that’s what I’m curious about. The stall seems pretty good for the stock unit, wondering if it’s just right.
 

Messages
1,323
Reactions
820
Points
162
Location
East Freetown, MA
Vehicle
2020 Explorer ST, Silver Spruce Metalic
#5
I can't remember where I saw it but it was 2,300 for the stock converter. ZFG sells the Suncoast Pro-Loc converter and recommends a stall speed of 2,800.

Edit: I just found it and it's actually on the ZFG site: Torque Converter
 

Messages
1,777
Reactions
1,293
Points
262
Location
Chicago, IL, USA
#6
I can't remember where I saw it but it was 2,300 for the stock converter. ZFG sells the Suncoast Pro-Loc converter and recommends a stall speed of 2,800.

Edit: I just found it and it's actually on the ZFG site: Torque Converter
That sounds about right for a turbo car. IIRC most of my cars and trucks were all under 2k rpm stock. I bet if you look back at his dyno charts, good things are happening at 2800rpm

I had a couple of high stall converters (3k+) in faster vehicles. They were great at the track but they sucked hard daily driving! With a loud exhaust they sounded like I was red light dragging even though I was barely feathering the throttle.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Messages
1,323
Reactions
820
Points
162
Location
East Freetown, MA
Vehicle
2020 Explorer ST, Silver Spruce Metalic
#7
Yeah, my mustang had a 3,500 TCI and sucked on the street. My 302 Ranger had a 2,800 Hughes and it was definately better.
 

OP
D

DaveFikel

New Member
U.S. Navy Veteran
Firefighter
Messages
7
Reactions
0
Points
1
Location
Chesterfield, VA
Vehicle
2023 Explorer ST
Thread Starter #8
Why do they suck so much on the street? I do have a complete 3" exhaust from engine to tail pipes.

Thanks for all the responses!
 

Messages
1,777
Reactions
1,293
Points
262
Location
Chicago, IL, USA
#10
Why do they suck so much on the street? I do have a complete 3" exhaust from engine to tail pipes.

Thanks for all the responses!
Cause they rev like crazy every time you are accelerating from a light even with light throttle. If it’s really loose the car won’t move until it hits its stall speed.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 

OP
D

DaveFikel

New Member
U.S. Navy Veteran
Firefighter
Messages
7
Reactions
0
Points
1
Location
Chesterfield, VA
Vehicle
2023 Explorer ST
Thread Starter #11
I watched a couple videos & I see why it'd be a pain. Thanks for all the input!
 

Messages
31
Reactions
11
Points
2
Location
Michigan
Vehicle
2025 Ford Explorer Platinum 3.0
#12
Years ago I had a 1972 Gran Torino 429 cu in. with a C6 and ended up finding a 1970 429 SCJ block for it and had a 514 cu in stroker motor built for it with a NOS Pro fogger kit along with all the necessary internals so it would survive, roller rocker, cam lifters, topped off with a 1050cfm carb. I ended up blowing up the C6 and had transmission shop build up another trans with SVO clutch plates, maunal valve body and some other mods, they also sold me a modded B&M super holeshot converter that had a higher stall in it. I don't remember noticing that it revved up much higher than the stock one did unless I loaded it up. Actually now that I think about it with all the HP and torque that motor made a stock converter would have been fine. Like someone else had mentioned I would contact ZFG and see what they would recommend.
 



Top