• Sign Up! To view all forums and unlock additional cool features

    Welcome to the #1 Explorer ST Forum and Explorer ST community dedicated to Explorer ST owners and enthusiasts. Register for an account, it's free and it's easy, so don't hesitate to join the Explorer ST Forum today!


Steeda or aFe Sway-Bar?

Messages
51
Reactions
6
Points
7
Location
Orange County, CA
Vehicle
2022 Explorer ST
#1
Any thoughts on Steeda's rear swaybar versus aFe's? I like that aFe has a rear AND front bar (and the fact they're red is an added plus, IMO). Does anyone know if Steeda is doing a front application?
 

UNBROKEN

4000 Post Club
Messages
4,640
Reactions
5,543
Points
352
Location
Houston, TX, USA
#2
Steeda says they’re doing a front bar. After testing with the Steeda rear and AFe front bars…I firmly do not believe a front bar is needed. The rear one makes a nice improvement…the front is minimal if anything and not worth the price or install hassle.
 

OP
MilosDad627
Messages
51
Reactions
6
Points
7
Location
Orange County, CA
Vehicle
2022 Explorer ST
Thread Starter #3
Thanks for that recommendation!
 

TMac

1000 Post Club
Messages
1,706
Reactions
1,496
Points
262
Location
Knoxville, TN
#4
The front and rear bars need to be balanced correctly- as I'm sure you all know. For me, on a street driven vehicle, I'd do the PIU front and rear sways and shocks. You better believe that Ford has made some significant investment in engineering to address that market segment. The PIU vehicles are tested pretty extensively and the results made public, so you can bet it's a pretty well balanced vehicle. Otherwise, I'd stick with the Steeda parts. Just my opinion.
 

Messages
295
Reactions
178
Points
37
Location
Sacramento, CA, USA
Vehicle
2021 Explorer ST Carbonized Gray
#5
The front and rear bars need to be balanced correctly- as I'm sure you all know. For me, on a street driven vehicle, I'd do the PIU front and rear sways and shocks. You better believe that Ford has made some significant investment in engineering to address that market segment. The PIU vehicles are tested pretty extensively and the results made public, so you can bet it's a pretty well balanced vehicle. Otherwise, I'd stick with the Steeda parts. Just my opinion.
I agree, the AFE's would have to be installed as a set to reap the benefits. But for the street I think the Steeda gives it a good balance.
 

Messages
86
Reactions
32
Points
17
Location
Colorado
Vehicle
2022 Explorer ST
#6
I have wondered about the angle of the mounting point for the end links, AFE is straight, and Steeda is angled. Not sure if it even matters.

I do like the AFE mounts better though.
 

UNBROKEN

4000 Post Club
Messages
4,640
Reactions
5,543
Points
352
Location
Houston, TX, USA
#7
I agree, the AFE's would have to be installed as a set to reap the benefits. But for the street I think the Steeda gives it a good balance.
Read post #2. These cars don’t really need a front bar. IRS cars like a lot of rear bar…the front bar added and set tight makes the car almost dangerous on high speed transitions. At it’s softest setting it’s a minimal if any improvement.
 

blackdog

Member
U.S. Navy Veteran
Messages
102
Reactions
39
Points
27
Location
MA
Vehicle
2021 Explorer ST
#8
Read post #2. These cars don’t really need a front bar. IRS cars like a lot of rear bar…the front bar added and set tight makes the car almost dangerous on high speed transitions. At it’s softest setting it’s a minimal if any improvement.
In your statement above you refer to testing. Is this your reason behind your statement that using the front bar could be dangerous? What were the results of the test and where can we read them?
 

UNBROKEN

4000 Post Club
Messages
4,640
Reactions
5,543
Points
352
Location
Houston, TX, USA
#9
In your statement above you refer to testing. Is this your reason behind your statement that using the front bar could be dangerous? What were the results of the test and where can we read them?
It’s all posted here somewhere. Don’t remember which thread.
 

blackdog

Member
U.S. Navy Veteran
Messages
102
Reactions
39
Points
27
Location
MA
Vehicle
2021 Explorer ST
#10
OK, thanks. If you find your post concerning the testing please post a link here.
 

blackdog

Member
U.S. Navy Veteran
Messages
102
Reactions
39
Points
27
Location
MA
Vehicle
2021 Explorer ST
#12
I agree, the AFE's would have to be installed as a set to reap the benefits. But for the street I think the Steeda gives it a good balance.
You're stating above that the Steeda "gives it a good balance" so I'll assume you're talking about the ST and roll balance between front and rear. I'll also assume that if you make that statement you've tested them. You are correct with your statement concerning the need for front and rear sway bars to reap the full benefits of either as it only possible to adjust and balance the roll rate if you have both the front and rear installed (AFE only.).
 

blackdog

Member
U.S. Navy Veteran
Messages
102
Reactions
39
Points
27
Location
MA
Vehicle
2021 Explorer ST
#13
You could do a search for it also. And post a link.
I have searched but unfortunately I'm not able to find a link specific to testing.
 

blackdog

Member
U.S. Navy Veteran
Messages
102
Reactions
39
Points
27
Location
MA
Vehicle
2021 Explorer ST
#14
Any thoughts on Steeda's rear swaybar versus aFe's? I like that aFe has a rear AND front bar (and the fact they're red is an added plus, IMO). Does anyone know if Steeda is doing a front application?
I would probably go with the AFE rear sway bar due to it's adjustability and overall build. You could follow that in the future with their front bar and know they were designed to work together. This gives you the ability to adjust front to rear. Keep in mind though that sway bars can make you ride stiffer than you want. Plus, there's no real benefit to matching sway bars and tuning the suspension if you only want to go fast in a straight line. It's all in the eyes of the beholder.

Here are the AFE specs. after their testing;

DETAILS:
  • CNC Bent, Tubular Front & Solid Rear Sway Bars
  • Ø38mm (1.5”) Front Sway Bar, 3-Way Adjustment
  • 387 lbs/in (31% Stiffer than Stock)
    425 lbs/in (44% Stiffer than Stock)
    475 lbs/in (61% Stiffer than Stock)
  • Ø25.4mm (1”) Rear Sway Bar, 3-Way Adjustment
  • 227 lbs/in (97% Stiffer than Stock)
    260 lbs/in (126% Stiffer than Stock)
    290 lbs/in (152% Stiffer than Stock)
  • 6061-T6 Billet Aluminum Bushing Brackets
  • 90A Durometer Polyurethane Bushings
  • Durable Red Powder Coat
  • Direct Fit Installation Requires No Modifications
  • Proudly Made in the USA
aFe CONTROL Sway Bar Set | aFe POWER
 

UNBROKEN

4000 Post Club
Messages
4,640
Reactions
5,543
Points
352
Location
Houston, TX, USA
#15
You're stating above that the Steeda "gives it a good balance" so I'll assume you're talking about the ST and roll balance between front and rear. I'll also assume that if you make that statement you've tested them. You are correct with your statement concerning the need for front and rear sway bars to reap the full benefits of either as it only possible to adjust and balance the roll rate if you have both the front and rear installed (AFE only.).
IRS cars react to swaybars drastically different than solid axle cars. Again…I can’t find a need for a front bar on this car. It’s 51/49 on the weight balance and it wants more rear bar. It doesn’t want more front bar. Just the rear bar is more than 99% of people will ever put to hard use. The cost and install difficulty on the front bar just make it not a really good buy. The rear bars are worth every penny though.
 

blackdog

Member
U.S. Navy Veteran
Messages
102
Reactions
39
Points
27
Location
MA
Vehicle
2021 Explorer ST
#16
Where does that 51/49 figure come from?
 

TMac

1000 Post Club
Messages
1,706
Reactions
1,496
Points
262
Location
Knoxville, TN
#17
Where does that 51/49 figure come from?
Your recent posts seem to be needlessly abrasive. Here is the source of the information. And, if one were to buy the newer RWD ST, it's probably closer to 50/50.
 

blackdog

Member
U.S. Navy Veteran
Messages
102
Reactions
39
Points
27
Location
MA
Vehicle
2021 Explorer ST
#18
In what way? Asking for information is abrasive? Grow up.
 

TMac

1000 Post Club
Messages
1,706
Reactions
1,496
Points
262
Location
Knoxville, TN
#19
Whether you realize it or not, your attitude comes through loud and clear from your posts....as exemplified by your last post! You say you're 72? Perhaps I'm not the one who needs to "Grow up". lol.
 

Last edited:
Messages
349
Reactions
288
Points
67
Location
The midwest
#20
Any thoughts on Steeda's rear swaybar versus aFe's? I like that aFe has a rear AND front bar (and the fact they're red is an added plus, IMO). Does anyone know if Steeda is doing a front application?
There are many threads on these sway bars, but the comments here cover the gist of it.

I’ve said many times that for an IRS-equipped vehicle, if you want to take corners tighter (i.e., more over-steer), you only need a larger rear bar and/or stiffer rear dampers. A front bar is just a waste of money. If you want to do it on the cheap, the PIU rear bar (23mm vs 21.7mm for the ST) is only $100. As also mentioned, the PIU shocks are another upgrade. I wouldn’t bother with the PIU front bar since it’s 35mm like the base model (one is hollow, one is solid), and the ST’s front bar is 34mm - the smaller front bar being better for tighter turning.

This chart from my Cobra site sums up all the high points nicely, along with good reading at these links:

http://terminator-cobra.com/suspension.htm

http://terminator-cobra.com/chassis & steering.htm

0F291BA6-8E26-4D4E-9D5B-CFA667C502C5.jpeg
 

Explorer ST Posts



Top